
contact@wix.com
+123-456-789
© 2035 by The Clinic.Powered and secured by Wix

THE ARTICLE'S PURPOSE & USE

The Purpose And Use Of The Articles
While I do not claim that Media24 was aware of the ultimate purpose or planned use of the articles when they published them, I am confident that WdS framed, motivated, and presented the articles with very clear intentions. His subsequent use of these publications served as proof of those intentions.
Compensating for the Lack of Evidence:
The articles published by News24, Netwerk24, and Rapport served a purpose beyond reporting. At the time, the Consortium, led by Keith and Inge Broad and WdS, faced insurmountable challenges in achieving their agenda through legal channels due to a lack of actual evidence.
Previous attempts by Keith Broad to introduce accusations in court failed under judicial scrutiny, as these allegations lacked substance. Recognizing that courts require evidence to substantiate claims, the Consortium pivoted to the media, specifically toward a publication WdS felt he could influence, as a platform where scrutiny might be less rigorous, and where allegations—however unfounded—could be presented as fact.
This shift allowed them to fill the gaps in their case with fabricated narratives absent the burden of cross-examination. While courts demand a high standard of evidence, journalistic integrity also requires similar rigor, including verification and fact-checking. The apparent lack of such measures in these publications enabled WdS to advance unsubstantiated claims unchallenged.


ARTICLE OF 14 JAN 22
"When they arrested Darren, Wouter was positioning the camera people, saying, ‘Get ready to take some nice photos and videos.’ He seemed in charge of everything.”

ARTICLE OF 14 JAN 22
"When they arrested Darren, Wouter was positioning the camera people, saying, ‘Get ready to take some nice photos and videos.’ He seemed in charge of everything.”

ARTICLE OF 14 JAN 22
"When they arrested Darren, Wouter was positioning the camera people, saying, ‘Get ready to take some nice photos and videos.’ He seemed in charge of everything.”
Keith Broad December 13 Application. Page 60

KB: “Before I deal with the procedural irregularities and, with respect, the fatal defects of the Respondent's application, I believe it prudent to address the events which have transpired since the last date this matter was enrolled for hearing (8 November 2022), which events are directly related to the purpose of this application and the relief sought by the First Applicant”.
KB introduces the matters for which he is entirely responsible as if these events have “transpired” entirely independently of him, his wife, WDS, YY etc. Failing to disclose to the courts that he was the author of what he introduces to the courts as events relevant to is application but unrelated to him
“7.1. On 14 December 2022, the Respondent was arrested for a second time and is, at the date of this affidavit, imprisoned in Pollsmoor”. “His arrest was effected by the South African Police Services (“SAPS”) and the SAPS Special Task Force at the address Russel was residing at 32 Fisherman’s Bend, LLANDUDNO”.
KB fails to mention that he was responsible for the second arrest, fails to mention he was the reason I was sent to Pollsmoor, and fails to mention that his and WDS’s proxy YY was the reason I was still in Pollsmoor, and was busy trying to extend remand so he could push this very application through the courts
“7.1.1. This property is owned by the Letchme Trust, who have experienced similar issues with the Respondent as in casu.
KB fails to mention that the owner of the Letchme Trust is one Ragi Moonsamy, the other landlords would was responsible for the illegal evictions of 14 December, who walked back into his property and took possession of the keys a few minutes after I had been taken away.
Keith Broad December 13 Application. Page 61

7.2. The Respondent's ball application was set down on 6 January 2023, and was then postponed to 2 February 2023 as a result of the Respondent being unable to produce a valid place of residence.
KB fails to mention that he and Moonsamy were the reason I could not produce a bail address, having had their attorney inform the magistrate I would not be allowed back into either of my two properties, despite them having absolutely no right to do so.
7.3. This is the Respondent's second arrest since he was released on bail on 22 August 2022 (CAS No.: 94/07/2022). Despite his release, the Respondent clearly continued with his alleged crimes / unlawful conduct which ultimately resulted in his arrest.
Again, KB fails to mention that he was responsible for the first arrest and that the matter had been thrown out, or his role in the second arrest. Further failing to mention that all parties had visited the storage unit after obtaining bail to demonstrate its existence and ensure the docket was closed. Which SAPS conveniently failed to do.
7.4. I have come to learn of the various open cases against the Respondent (both civil matters and criminal). I attach hereto a document listing the open cases / charges against the Respondent, and the respective Case / CAS numbers, marked as "KB3".
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the cases listed. Which by that point each one that had been tested, eg in court had been thoroughly discredited and thrown out. Just as the case rated to the December arrest would be. Although not until it was too late t mount a defense to KB’s application.
7.4.1. As will be noted from the contents therein, there are 9 criminal cases opened against the Respondent, 8 of which relate to charges of fraud for his 'business' activities and two of the 8 for damage to property.
7.4.2. There are further 6 civil cases / harassment applications against the Respondent.
KB also fails to mention that “harassment” case was brought by him, was based entirely on perjury and was a stunt to assist in his attempt to sabotage the High Court spoliation proceedings
Keith Broad December 13 Application. Page 62

The Respondent is further being Investigated as to whether he is an illegal immigrant.
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for that situation, for the theft of both passports, the sabotage of the visa extensions. All of it aided by SAPS, and more especially YY and SD
7.5. The author of the aforementioned document is Mr. Wouter de Swardt, the private investigator I appointed. I shall ensure a confirmatory affidavit deposed to by Mr De Swardt is filed prior to the hearing of this application.
An explicit reference to the dossier produced by WDS for use in these very proceedings. Using the arrest of December as the main event. This dossier was the closest thing to a docket we had seen and it was both astonishing and outrageous that YY had cooperated to such a degree with WDS, KB et al and that KB had more information available to him than we were ever given
7.6. Since the Respondent's arrest, various news articles have been published which neatly summarise the Respondent's modus operandi. I attach hereto, the following:
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
Keith Broad December 13 Application. Page 63

7.6.1. IOL Article titled "I almost got scammed by Darren Russell - the alleged Cape Town Airbnb swindler" dated 16 January 2023, marked as "KB4";
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
7.6.2. News24 Article by Carin Smith titled "Second arrest for Cape Town luxury accommodation 'scammer' suspected of pocketing millions" dated 14 January 2023, marked as "KB5";
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
7.6.3. Netwerk24 Article by Maygene de Wee titled "Brit wéér in Kaap aangekeer ná verhuurslenter" dated 17 December 2022, marked as "KB6";
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
7.6.4. There was further an online petition started by a Mario Boffa, on change.org, titled "Let's STOP Darren Russell de Rodez aka La Collection The Holiday SCAMMER British Citizen", a screenshot of the website petition is attached hereto, marked as "KB7",
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, along with Denis Dalton and Johan Schalkwyk had threatened Mario Boffa, just a they had done with Chandre Abrahams, failing also to mention Mr Boffa’s key role in the embezzlement f over a million rand, the scam operation he , Denis Dalton and Johan Schalkwyk set up afterwards, or their role in the arrest, or their role in the illegal operation at 16 Leirmans
























































Establishing Credibility and Legitimacy for False Claims:
By leveraging respected media outlets, the Consortium aimed to circumvent legal safeguards against slander and fabricated evidence. News24 and affiliated publications lent a veneer of legitimacy to the Consortium’s accusations, portraying these claims as substantiated findings. Once published, the articles became instruments to present their narrative as credible and legitimate. This media endorsement effectively "laundered" their falsehoods, transforming allegations dismissed in court into what appeared to be credible and objective findings.
Use as Supposedly “Independent Evidence”:
With these articles in the public domain, the Consortium could present them in court as “independent sources,” creating an illusion of multiple, corroborating investigations. The articles gave an impression of objective corroboration that lent weight to their claims, which faced rejection without the layer of media endorsement.
Weaponizing Anonymity to Disguise Motive and Manipulate Public Opinion:
By granting anonymity to central figures, including Inge Broad, who was directly involved, these publications furthered an illusion of impartiality. Concealing Inge’s identity as Keith Broad’s wife allowed the Consortium to portray accusations as if they stemmed from independent sources rather than vested interests. This anonymity fostered a false impression that these findings were unbiased, masking the real motives and individuals driving the allegations.
Distorting Public Perception and Masking Criminal Behaviour:
Beyond the legal setting, the articles shaped public opinion, casting me as the villain while concealing the Consortium’s unlawful conduct. The narratives painted me as an untrustworthy tenant, overshadowing or omitting their attempts to forcibly seize property through illegal evictions, misrepresentation, and intimidation. By embedding this narrative within well-known media platforms, the Consortium shielded their misconduct from scrutiny and deterred law enforcement from questioning their actions.
Amplifying Their Reach and Recruiting Allies:
Media coverage expanded the Consortium’s influence, allowing them to recruit supporters who might otherwise have remained uninvolved. Leveraging these articles to reinforce their portrayal of me as a criminal, they encouraged others, including Ragi Moonsamy, the landlord of Fisherman’s Bend, to join their cause. This fabricated portrayal of me as a “villain” swayed public perception, leading others to support their agenda and amplifying the collective damage inflicted on me.


_edited.jpg)

ARTICLE OF 14 JAN 22
"When they arrested Darren, Wouter was positioning the camera people, saying, ‘Get ready to take some nice photos and videos.’ He seemed in charge of everything. Get ready to take some nice photos and videos.’ He seemed in charge of everything.”

Providing Justification for the December Arrest:
The Consortium timed these articles to influence law enforcement and bolster the December 2022 arrest. By pre-establishing a narrative of guilt, they pressured authorities to take action despite the absence of concrete evidence, ensuring that my absence from the scene would ease their property takeover efforts unopposed.
Omissions and Selective Reporting:
By selectively omitting exculpatory details, including rebuttals and dismissed charges, the publications deprived readers of a balanced view. This one-sided reporting violated my right to reply and cemented the Consortium’s distorted narrative. Missing key details, like court dismissals, which would have disproven or challenged the Consortium’s claims, were conveniently omitted, leaving an unchallenged portrayal that painted me in an unjustly negative light.
Exploiting Media’s Influence to Shape Public and Judicial Perceptions:
Media24’s expansive reach enabled the Consortium to amplify their accusations, leaving a lasting impression on readers, potential clients, and even court officials. Media24 broadcast damaging narratives with its authority behind them, lending unjustified weight to fabrications. This widespread dissemination created severe, lasting reputational and financial harm, far exceeding the immediate impact of the articles themselves.
Summary:
The Consortium’s engagement with the media served not to inform the public but to fabricate legitimacy, evade judicial standards, and manipulate outcomes. With Media24’s support, they bypassed the evidentiary requirements of the courts, effectively shifting the burden of proof and exploiting public trust to advance their agenda, including as just one example, having had their attorney (the same Johan Victor as appeared in the articles, where he is misrepresented as representing the “victims”) inform the magistrate that I would not be allowed back into either of my two properties, despite them having absolutely no right to do so, to deny me a bail address. Something they then used against me in the court papers, without any reference as to the how, who or why.

HOUSEKEEPER
ABOUT DE SWARDT
"After Darren was taken away, I saw Ragy (the landlord) arriving in his red Ferrari. He turned up immediately after Darren was arrested, only minutes after..”
HOUSEKEEPER
ABOUT DE SWARDT
''Then, about 15 or 20 minutes later, Ragy’s assistant turned up. It was all clearly arranged because the timing was so precise.''
HOUSEKEEPER
ABOUT DE SWARDT
"We had no choice but to leave because of the police presence and everything that had happened
HOUSEKEEPER
ABOUT DE SWARDT
"I remember Darren being taken away in handcuffs. Wouter had the camera crew all set up and was alerting them, saying, ‘Get ready, he’s t was all planned to capture the moment Darren was taken away.”

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
– Martin Luther King Jr.